Find stocks whose 1-week through 1-year returns have moved in a more consistent direction without one abrupt short-term jump dominating the pattern.
Reconnecting
Smooth history does not make a trend sustainable.This screen is an educational consistency filter, not a prediction, recommendation, or promise. Prices can reverse suddenly because of news, liquidity, valuation, or wider market conditions.
Five horizons1W · 1M · 3M · 6M · 1YMinimum alignment4 of 5 periodsShort-term shock testWeekly and monthly caps72+Consistency thresholdOut of 100
Quick filtersStart with a research view
Higher consistency means more aligned historical moves, not a safer investment. Lower monthly volatility means smaller reported swings. Relative volume compares trading activity, not expected returns. A highest price of 0 means no upper price limit.
Showing 0 of 0 rising matches · filter by company size
Keep or share this research view
Save a named view here, or share a link to its public filters. Quotes refresh independently. Remove personal information from the search text first. Nothing is saved automatically.
No rising stocks currently pass every smoothness rule for this company-size filter. This is preferable to weakening the criteria or presenting an unstable pattern as dependable.
How qualification works
Consistency, not certainty
The 1-year move must be meaningful but not extreme: 12–80% for rising patterns and 12–60% for falling patterns.
At least four of five time horizons must point in the same direction.
Cumulative moves should generally build from 1 week toward 1 year instead of appearing in one sudden period.
Weekly moves are capped at 6%, monthly moves at 15%, and 3/6-month moves are capped relative to the annual change. Monthly volatility is penalized above 6%.
Only scores of 72 or higher appear. A high score describes the past path; it does not forecast the next move.
All five return periods and monthly volatility must be reported. Missing volatility is not replaced with an invented percentage. Saved views store these filters, not historical quotes or a backtest.